For this blog, I will offer my
opinions on Avinish Kaushaik’s blog post “Path Analysis: A Good use of time?” My opinions will be expressed as responses to the following questions:
Question 1: Do you agree or
disagree with the post? Why?
I do agree with this post. Path Analysis can provide some
good preliminary data, but I do not necessarily think the quality of data is
always worth the energy and resources need to get it. One particular area of Path
Analysis that is often flawed, according to Avinish, is the inability to
determine which page in a series is most influential to the customers. In other
words, which page can be attributed to the customer moving on or completing a
desired action? The main goal of doing web page analysis is identifying what
influences our customers’ decisions once they reach our website. If page
analysis cannot identify which pages are most influential, then it fall short
of the primary goal.
Question 2: How could your company
use Path Analysis?
For this question, let’s use Amazon.com as an example.
Amazon could use this technique in evaluating Digital Marketing Landing Page
(DM) or their Checkout pages. Page Analysis could be effective in these types
of situations because there is no navigation required on the part of the
consumers. These scenarios are typically structured so customers can just keep
clicking “Next.” Analyzing a structured Path vs. one that has a customer
bouncing around, eliminates the need to account for typical browsing patterns
of jumping from page to page in a non-linear path.
Question 3: What advantages or dis
advantages would Path Analysis provide?
One advantage of Path analysis is the ability now, for tools
like Click Tracks, to group pages with related content into categories. This
eliminates linearity and allows a company to use data from customers jumping
from page to page out of sequence. Another advantage is it highlights how
different segments of the analysis are influenced by various content. Being
able determine which percentages of visitors arrived via a search engine (i.e.,
Google) vs. the overall number can show a company how effective their SEO is.
One disadvantage of Path Analysis is it is difficult to
depict and determine the paths customers typically use. According to Avinish,
less than 5% of visitors follow the most common path. If only a small group of
visitors are utilizing the common path, it is difficult to make effective
decisions for the majority. Another disadvantage is the number of paths
visitors could take could be overwhelming…depending on the number of possible
pages. With a large number of possible combinations, it would be time consuming
and inefficient to examine all the possible patterns for a minimal amount of
useful data.
No comments:
Post a Comment