For this blog, I
will analyze a search budget distribution table for a fictional company (see
below).
Question 1: Does
the search traffic appear to match the budget?
I would that the budget does match the search traffic. As
you can see from the table above the majority of the budget (75%)is allocated
to the “Tail Key Phrases,” with most of the visits coming from Search Engine
Marketing (SEM). Granted, the percentages between the budget and traffic data
are not exact, but the areas that received more money produced more traffic.
Question 2: What
recommendations do you have?
One recommendation I have for this company is to find a way
to increase the percentage of visitors from Search Engine Optimization (SEO).
By increasing the amount of traffic from SEO, particularly under the “Tail Key
Phrases,” the company would be able to sustain a high level of growth.
Another recommendation I have would be for the company to
re-evaluates how it utilizes SEM and SEO for “Head Key Phrases.” Based on the
table above, money spent on SEM produced considerably lower numbers than the
organic results from SEO. If a company is spending money on SEM, than the
results should be greater than those provided by SEO. The company is not
maximizing their results obtained from Pay-per-click ads when it comes to
branded keywords.

I agree that the budget seems to match the search traffic information. With three quarters of the budget dedicated to the tail key phrases then it makes sense that it has most of the traffic overall. This does however make me wonder about the effectiveness of the organization when it comes to organic search engine optimization.
ReplyDelete